Planar
and Tubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Dynamic Simulation Approach
Modular Approach:
Individual simulation modules for each fuel cell type
- Tubular SOFC
- Planar SOFC
- MCFC
- PEM
Reformer module
Gas turbine module (compressor and turbine sub-modules)
Combustor module
Catalytic oxidizer module
Heat exchanger module
Humidifier module
Condenser module
Pumps, valves, regulators, plumbing, and other balance of plant (BOP)
Standardized Framework For Dynamic Modeling & Controls
- Collaboration between Control group (Prof. F. Jabbari) and Dynamic Simulation (Prof. S. Samuelsen, J. Brouwer, …)
- MATLAB and SimulinkTM Framework Chosen
- User friendly package by MathWorks (Matlab)
- Flexibility
- Prepackaged modules
- Object oriented
- Easy to learn and use
- Hardware extensible
- Transferable to other software
- Natural for adding controls development and power electronics
Previous Module Development
Reformer, SOFC, MCFC, PEM, Gas Turbine
General Model Assumptions
- 1D process flow
- Well-stirred within nodal volume
- Slow pressure transients
Fuel Cell Assumptions
- H2 electrochemically oxidized only
- CO consumed via water-gas shift
- Shift always at equilibrium (constraint)
- Equipotential: Vcell = Vnode 1 = Vnode n
Dynamic Model Basic Equations
Equation of State ![]()
Mass Conservation Equations
-
Calculates changes in mole fraction based on inlet molar flows and reaction rates
Dynamic Model Basic Equations
Energy Conservation
- Gaseous

- Solid

Heat Transfer
- Conduction
- Axially from node to node through solids
- Between nodal materials (bipolar plates, electrodes, …)
Convection
- Between surfaces and gases
- Based on Nusselt number
Radiation
- From surface to surface
- Geometry is an issue
- Concentric cylinders: TSOFC
- Parallel planes: PSOFC
- Other: combustor, reformer
Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Electrochemistry
Cell Reactions 
Nerst Potential 
- Ideal operating voltage with respect to partial pressures of cell reactants
Steam Reformation – Occurs in Reformer and
Fuel Cells
Methane reformation reaction 
- Reaction rates on nickel based catalysts:
Lee et al. (1990) and Ross et al. (1972)
Water Gas Shift – Occurs in Reformers and in Fuel Cells
Shift reaction
![]()
- Reaction proceeds fast enough at elevated temperatures to assume equilibrium
- Algebraic constraint at exit of each node
Fuel Cell Operation
Actual operating voltage ![]()
- Polarization losses are due to kinetics, mass transport and electrical resistances
PSOFC DISCRETIZATION
10 Discrete Computational Nodes
- Anode Gas
- Cathode Gas
- Cell Solid
- Bi-Polar Plates

Sample TSOFC Outputs: 10% Load Increase
Progress and Current Status
Jet Fuel Equilibrium Results
- Various Jet Fuel thermodynamic data acquired
-
Commercial Aviation Fuel, Jet-A
- C11H21
- MW: 153 g/mol
- Heat of formation (DHfo): -249 kJ/mol
- Traditional Air Force Military Aviation Fuel,
JP-4
- C10H19.4
- MW: 139 g/mol
- Heat of formation (DHfo): -227 kJ/mol
- Traditional Navy Military Aviation Fuel, JP-5
- C10H19.2
- MW: 139 g/mol
- Heat of formation (DHfo): -222 kJ/mol
- Standard Military Aviation Fuel, JP-8
- C12H23
- MW: 167 g/mo
- Heat of formation (DHfo): -319 kJ/mol
Jet Fuel Equilibrium Results


Jet Fuel Equilibrium Results – Effects of S/C

Jet Fuel Equilibrium Results – Effects of O/C


Jet Fuel Equilibrium Results – Partial Oxidation

New Module Development
Reaction Mechanism Need and Approaches
- Use Equilibrium results in look-up tables with discretized dynamic
model for heat transfer, mass and momentum conservation
- Use Chemical Kinetics from a simpler hydrocarbon set
- Obtain data and/or develop simple chemical kinetic mechanism for JP-5
Must incorporate dynamic equations
- Heat transfer (conduction, convection, radiation)
- Mass (or species) conservation
- Momentum conservation
- Energy conservation
Main module development need is for the overall geometry of the NuElement Module
Dynamic JP-5 Reformer Module
Concentric Cylinders
- Combustor
- Catalyst Bed
- Preheat
- Anode off-gas recycle (option)
Reformation Kinetics

New Module Development
- Reformer Geometry (5 nodes)

- Six Step Reaction Mechanism

- Arrhenius Rate Expressions

- Reaction Equilibrium Constants

-
Reformer Dynamic Simulation Results – S/C 1.0 à 1.5

- Reformer Dynamic Simulation Results – S/C 1.0 à 1.5

- Reformer Dynamic Simulation Results – O/C 0.25 à 0.5


- Reformer Dynamic Simulation Results – Catalyst “light off”

Personnel
Investigators: J. Brouwer, F. Jabbari, and G.S. Samuelsen,
Students: Li Yuan, Fabian Mueller, Anh-Tuan Do
Sponsors
U.S. Department of Energy
California Energy Commission
Siemens Power Corporation






